Blog

Chinese AI Models Are No Longer Playing Catch-Up

By TLDL

Alibaba's Qwen 3.5 Plus and other Chinese models are challenging US AI dominance with large-scale multimodal capabilities and aggressive pricing. Here's what the shift means.

Chinese AI Models Are No Longer Playing Catch-Up

The narrative of Chinese AI as perpetually behind American counterparts is aging poorly. Recent releases from Alibaba, DeepSeek, and other Chinese labs demonstrate genuine technical leadership in key areas—and aggressive market positioning that's reshaping global AI economics.

The Qwen 3.5 Plus Announcement

Alibaba's latest model release makes a compelling case for Chinese AI capability:

Scale and architecture: A 397-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with native multimodal reasoning and a 1-million-token context window.

Pricing that disrupts: $1.2 per million input tokens and $7.2 per million output tokens—significantly undercutting many Western competitors.

Multimodal native: Unlike some models that bolt on vision capabilities, Qwen was designed for multimodal from the ground up.

This isn't a research demo. It's a production offering targeting the same enterprise customers US labs court.

Why This Matters for the Market

The rise of capable Chinese models creates several shifts:

Price pressure is intensifying. When a 397B parameter model costs a fraction of competitors, it sets a new floor for inference pricing globally.

Open-weight leadership is contested. Chinese labs have embraced open-weight releases, creating viable alternatives to Meta's Llama and other Western open models.

Talent and research is distributed. Major AI advances now emerge from multiple global hubs, not just US labs. This affects everything from conference content to patent filing.

The Geopolitical Twist

This technical progress arrives amid significant tension. US export controls aimed to limit China's AI development by restricting advanced chip access. The results suggest those restrictions may have accelerated domestic innovation rather than containing it.

Chinese labs are also competing on different terms than Western companies—often with lower capital costs, different regulatory environments, and direct government support for strategic industries.

What This Means for You

If you're building AI products: Multi-model strategies make more sense than ever. The ability to switch between providers based on capability, price, and availability is becoming a competitive advantage.

If you're evaluating AI vendors: The landscape has expanded. Chinese models merit serious evaluation alongside Western alternatives for many use cases.

If you're concerned about vendor lock-in: Open-weight models from Chinese labs offer alternatives to consider. The ecosystem is more diverse than six months ago.

The Bigger Picture

The AI race is becoming genuinely global. US labs remain influential, but the assumption of permanent American dominance no longer holds.

For practitioners, this competition creates opportunity. More providers means more choice, better pricing, and faster innovation. The challenge shifts from "which model should I use" to "how do I build systems that leverage multiple models effectively."

The next time someone says "Chinese AI is years behind," point them to Qwen 3.5 Plus.


Stay ahead of AI trends. tldl summarizes podcasts from builders and investors in the AI space.

Related

Author

T

TLDL

AI-powered podcast insights

← Back to blog

Enjoyed this article?

Get the best AI insights delivered to your inbox daily.

Newsletter

Stay ahead of the curve

Key insights from top tech podcasts, delivered daily. Join 10,000+ engineers, founders, and investors.

One email per day. Unsubscribe anytime.